Hundreds of Years of Combined Experience
Shustak Frost & Partners, a Professional Corporation, and its partners have received the highest rating for both legal ability and ethics (AV*) from Martindale-Hubbell, the nationally recognized publication that reviews and ranks lawyers and law firms.
Our attorneys are routinely quoted in major business and financial periodicals including The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Treasury and Risk Management, Corporate Financing Week, Capital Markets Analysts, Registered Representative, the National Law Journal, The San Diego Daily Transcript and Legal Tech.
Our managing partner, Erwin J. Shustak, has more than 36 years of legal experience. In 2007, 2008 and 2009, he was selected for inclusion in Southern California's Super Lawyers® magazine for his expertise in business and securities litigation, and he was featured in the Southern California edition of The New York Times. He also was selected by the editors of the San Diego Daily Transcript as one of the "Top Ten Attorneys in 2005" and was nominated by that same publication as a "Top Influential" of 2010. He was selected by the Board of Editors of the San Diego Daily Transcript as a "Top Influential of 2012."
To learn read more about our partners, follow the profile links below:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Thomas C. Frost Esq.
- Robert Hill Esq.
- Besse M. Johannsen Esq.
- Stuart Kagen Esq.
- Stephen Lux Esq.
- George Christopher Miller Esq.
- Joseph M. Parker Esq.
- Michele Christine Perino Esq.
- Mary C. Scott-Hattendorf Esq.
- Erwin J. Shustak Esq.
- Jonah A. Toleno Esq.
Schedule a free initial consultation by calling Shustak Frost & Partners toll free at 888-748-8748, or contact us online. Se habla español / Nagsasalita kami ng Tagalog.
*AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings fall into two categories — legal ability and general ethical standards.
