At the end of October, Morgan Stanley, with a mere several weeks’ notice to all its thousands of brokers- many of whom joined Morgan when Morgan was a long-time member of the Protocol for Broker Recruiting (“Protocol”) and who entered Morgan themselves following the Protocol and bringing with them, from their prior firms, client information- exited the Protocol which it had signed back in 2006. Smith Barney, with whom Morgan merged many years ago, had been one of the original three signatories to the Protocol back in 2004. The ostensible reason Morgan gave for exiting the Protocol was to provide better focus on its existing brokers and avoid the recruiting efforts of smaller, independent firms that Morgan alleges abused the Protocol solely to poach producers from Morgan and other wire houses. What many believe to be the real reason, however, is to “pull up the drawbridge” and essentially trap its brokers as captives. Morgan’s recent legal skirmishes since its “Prexit” on November 3rd, however, has shown it intends to vigorously and aggressively pursue defectors who either take client information or attempt to solicit those clients. Since the November 3, Prexit, Morgan has initiated at least two court actions seeking Temporary Restraining Orders and Preliminary Injunctions against brokers who left Morgan after its Prexit and who, Morgan alleges, took client information and solicited clients to move with them to their new firms. Morgan obviously wants to send a loud and clear message to its now captive brokers- if you leave, you cannot take anything with you nor solicit your former clients or we will bring the heavy hand of the law down on you like a ton of bricks. John Fitzgerald, a New Jersey former Morgan broker, left Morgan in early December, one month after Prexit, to start his own firm. …
Read More