Blog

“We’re in it to win it,” said George C. Miller of Shustak Reynolds & Partners, P.C. – and win it they did!

We are proud to announce that our firm took top honors for cash donated and number of suits collected in the small firm category of LAWSUITS, a cash and professional clothing drive for local law firms organized by Second Chance and Chaired by San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis. Our firm collected 18 suits and other professional clothing and $500 in cash donations which will be made available to graduates of Second Chance’s job readiness training program. The program helps at-risk youth, the homeless, recovering addicts and former prisoners reenter the community and workforce. Thank you to everyone who made our first year in the annual LAWSUITS competition a tremendous success. We plan to up the ante next year! Schedule a free initial consultation by calling Shustak Reynolds & Partners, P.C. toll free at 888-748-8748, or contact us online. 

Read More

Shustak Reynolds & Partners Speaking to Ventures Trust II Investors

Shustak Reynolds & Partners, P.C. announces that it has been retained to represent several individuals in connection with the Ponzi scheme fraud allegedly perpetrated by PAUL TABET, his wife,JENIFER TABET and former Oregon politician CRAIG BERKMAN. PAUL TABET and CRAIG BERKMAN purportedly managed venture capital fund VENTURES TRUST II which, they claimed, had […]

Read More

UPDATE: Schwab Wins Fight Over Class Action Waivers, For Now

Just over one year ago, FINRA initiated disciplinary proceedings against Charles Schwab & Co. claiming, amongst other things, that the firm violated FINRA rules by requiring customers to sign agreements containing broadly-worded class action waivers. In an unusually long, 48-page written decision issued last […]

Read More

Rancho Santa Fe “Investment Guru” Pleads Not Guilty to Fraud Charge

Earlier this year, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged James B. Catledge, Derek F.C. Elliott and several related entities with fraud in connection with the sale of unregistered investments in the “Juan Dolio Resort” and another property located in the Dominican Republic. According to […]

Read More

Apple and Samsung to Discuss Settlement Over Patent Lawsuits May 21

A highly contentious and very public lawsuit between Apple and Samsung over Smartphone technology may be moving forward outside of court. The two companies have agreed to hold talks in front of a San Francisco judge on May 21, perhaps the first step in resolving the yearlong dispute over intellectual property. Spanning 10 countries and 50 filings, the dispute arose when Apple initiated a lawsuit claiming that Samsung "slavishly" copied the iPhone and iPad for its Galaxy line of products. Apple asserts that Samsung copied the appearance of Apple technology. Samsung then countersued, alleging that Apple violated Samsung's patents on certain data communications technology. Judge Lucy Koh has ordered the two companies to participate in alternative dispute resolution, and both CEOs and general counsels will be in attendance. Various media outlets have reported the ADR is "semi-voluntary" and will be moderated by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero, who is otherwise unaffiliated with the case. It is not clear that the talks will immediately end the litigation, but many experts believe that the talks may help to move the litigation forward. Apple CEO Tim Cook stated in last quarter’s report that he would rather settle than pursue litigation, but that "[we] need people to invent their own stuff." Apple has been in various lawsuits since 2010 with companies that use Google's Android operating system. Samsung currently provides Apple with many computer chips and other components for its products. Alternative dispute resolution has gained wide popularity in recent years as companies attempt to limit expensive and time-consuming litigation. ADR uses an unbiased third-party as either a mediator, who facilitates negotiation between the two opposing parties, or as an arbiter, who ultimately resolves the issue after each side has presented arguments. The mediation between Apple and Samsung regarding their intellectual property is non-binding and…

Read More

SEC Accuses San Diego Advisor Ray Lucia of Misleading Investors

In early September 2012, the SEC initiated formal cease and desist proceedings against San Diego-based financial advisor Raymond J. Lucia, Sr. and his company, Raymond J. Lucia Companies, Inc. According to the SEC, Lucia mislead investors by claiming his proprietary “Buckets of […]

Read More

Merrill Lynch to Pay $40 Million in Deferred Comp Class Action Suit

In late August, Merrill Lynch agreed to a proposed $40 million class action settlement to settle claims the firm refused to pay deferred compensation owed to its brokers after its 2008 merger with Bank of America. The case, which involves a class […]

Read More

Shustak Reynolds & Partners, P.C. Obtains $486,615 FINRA Arbitration Award Against MSSB and Citigroup for Misrepresentations Made to Financial Advisor During Recruitment

The firm announces that it obtained a $486,615.77 FINRA arbitration award against Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (“MSSB”), Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (“Citigroup”) on behalf of a financial advisor formerly employed by Citigroup’s Smith Barney division (“Smith […]

Read More

Shustak Reynolds & Partners, P.C. Obtains $622,000.00 FINRA Arbitration Award Against Fidelity

The firm announces that it obtained a $622,000.00 FINRA arbitration award against Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC (“Fidelity”) on behalf of an 86 year old investor who had opened a joint account at a San Diego Fidelity office. The amount awarded the firm’s […]

Read More

SEC Charges Absolute Fund Advisors With Operating “Ponzi-like” Scheme

the SEC filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Absolute Fund Advisors, LLC, Absolute Fund Management, LLC and Jason J. Konior seeking an injunction preventing the defendants from operating a “Ponzi-like” scheme […]

Read More

Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) Compliance of Employers is Tougher Than It Sounds

I recently attended a professional CFO roundtable as a subject matter expert on Obamacare compliance issues for employers. It was an excellent discussion which included CFO’s from firms ranging in size from less than 50 to more than 250 employees. Coming out of the CFO roundtable, the biggest challenge centers around tracking employees with precision so as to ensure the employer avoids the excise taxes (penalties) under IRC § 4980H. Several participants echoed this sentiment saying: “It’s not practical for us to even know how many employees we have at any given moment right now. How am I supposed to make sure I’ve offered coverage to everyone I am supposed to?” What’s clear is that working to comply with Obamacare’s Employer Shared Responsibility provisions, and the Notice and Reporting provisions, will require a significant change in how Applicable Large Employers’ HR, Finance, and Legal Departments interact with one another. Behind Obamacare’s requirements lie employers’ continuing responsibilities under ERISA, HIPPA and state labor laws. Organizations that don’t formulate their Obamacare compliance systems with those other rules in mind can build significant amounts of risk into their business. Many businesses seemed to be still in the first stages of figuring out how to work Affordable Care Act compliance into their organizations. Other organizations have already decided it’s impractical to work compliance in-house and plan to outsource the tasks to third-parties. News reporters like to highlight those employers looking at “manipulating hours” (i.e. reducing or controlling hours to control employees’ entitlement to employer-sponsored health insurance). However this strategy poses a lot of risks and must be executed almost flawlessly to obtain its benefits. Employers manipulating hours run the risks of incurring overtime (for those employees picking up the slack), or worse yet, the risk of exempt employees becoming non-exempt under state wage &…

Read More