Blog

Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) Compliance of Employers is Tougher Than It Sounds

I recently attended a professional CFO roundtable as a subject matter expert on Obamacare compliance issues for employers. It was an excellent discussion which included CFO’s from firms ranging in size from less than 50 to more than 250 employees. Coming out of the CFO roundtable, the biggest challenge centers around tracking employees with precision so as to ensure the employer avoids the excise taxes (penalties) under IRC § 4980H. Several participants echoed this sentiment saying: “It’s not practical for us to even know how many employees we have at any given moment right now. How am I supposed to make sure I’ve offered coverage to everyone I am supposed to?” What’s clear is that working to comply with Obamacare’s Employer Shared Responsibility provisions, and the Notice and Reporting provisions, will require a significant change in how Applicable Large Employers’ HR, Finance, and Legal Departments interact with one another. Behind Obamacare’s requirements lie employers’ continuing responsibilities under ERISA, HIPPA and state labor laws. Organizations that don’t formulate their Obamacare compliance systems with those other rules in mind can build significant amounts of risk into their business. Many businesses seemed to be still in the first stages of figuring out how to work Affordable Care Act compliance into their organizations. Other organizations have already decided it’s impractical to work compliance in-house and plan to outsource the tasks to third-parties. News reporters like to highlight those employers looking at “manipulating hours” (i.e. reducing or controlling hours to control employees’ entitlement to employer-sponsored health insurance). However this strategy poses a lot of risks and must be executed almost flawlessly to obtain its benefits. Employers manipulating hours run the risks of incurring overtime (for those employees picking up the slack), or worse yet, the risk of exempt employees becoming non-exempt under state wage &…

Read More

Merrill Lynch Pays the Piper for Failing to Arbitrate Promissory Note Disputes

As the latest in a series of large fines levied against the nation’s few remaining wirehouse firms in early 2012, FINRA announced on Wednesday, January 25, that it fined Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith $1 million for refusing to arbitrate promissory […]

Read More

FINRA Fines Citigroup $725,000 for Failure to Disclose Conflicts of Interest

FINRA started the new year off by levying a $725,000.00 fine against Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., for failing to disclose potential conflicts of interest in certain research reports the firm published from January 2007 through March 2010. According to FINRA, Citigroup (a) […]

Read More

San Diego’s “Investment Placement Group” Pays $4 Million to Settle SEC Charges

Investment Placement Group (IPG), an independent brokerage firm headquartered in downtown San Diego, agreed in late December to pay the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approximately $4 million in penalties to settle charges that the firm failed to supervise Aurelio Rodriguez, one […]

Read More

New SEC/FINRA alert on Broker-Dealer Branch Inspections and Broker Supervision

On November 30, 2011, the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) issued a Regulatory Risk Alert outlining effective policies and procedures for broker-dealer branch inspections and broker supervision. The alert serves as a reminder of existing Securities Exchange Act and […]

Read More

FINRA Sanctions 8 Firms for Due Diligence Failure in Private Placements

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the self-regulated organization responsible for overseeing brokers and broker-dealers, has sanctioned eight firms and ten individuals for recommending private placement investments without a reasonable basis to customers. Among the firms sanctioned are: NEXT Financial Group; Investors […]

Read More

The Effect of California’s Expungement Rules on Registered Representatives and Investment Advisers

Registered representatives, investment advisers and others employed in the securities industry are required to disclose certain prior criminal convictions, including some “expunged” convictions, to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) or the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in connection with their employment. […]

Read More